Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jeskai Oculus | pedro lemos | 10-4 | None |
| Mono-Red Aggro | léo guimard | 10-4 | None |
| Mono-Red Aggro | alessandro_cecconi | 9-5 | None |
| Izzet Prowess | shoji kimura | 9-3 | None |
| Mono-Red Aggro | luke doyle | 8-6 | None |
| Izzet Prowess | stefano vinci | 8-6 | None |
| Temur Otters | yuya hosokawa | 8-4 | None |
| Mono-Red Aggro | riki kamo | 6-2 | None |
| Jeskai Oculus | shogo muto | 6-2 | None |
| Izzet Prowess | jiří kračman | 6-2 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Boros Aggro , Boros Burn , Boros Monument , Goblins , Gruul Aggro , Gruul Delirium , Gruul Leyline , Izzet Cauldron , Izzet Prowess , Jeskai Control
Meta Performance Analysis
Redcap Melee ranks #286 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 6%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Red average: 49.2%
Performance compared to other Red cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Redcap Melee is a very strong card that performs well in most contexts.
Recommended number of copies: 4
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 6.58 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 1 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.4%. Redcap Melee has a win rate of 56.6%, making it 19.4% better than other 1-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Redcap Melee than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Light of Hope | Instant | 1 | 6 | 68.2% | 55.1% | +13.0% |
| Lava Coil | Sorcery | 2 | 7 | 66.7% | 57.0% | +9.6% |
| Rip Apart | Sorcery | 2 | 7 | 64.7% | 56.4% | +8.3% |
| Rending Volley | Instant | 1 | 5 | 63.6% | 57.8% | +5.8% |
| Akoum Hellhound | Creature — Elemental Dog | 1 | 5 | 64.5% | 58.8% | +5.7% |
| Fire Prophecy | Instant | 2 | 22 | 61.5% | 56.9% | +4.7% |
| Shark Typhoon | Enchantment | 6 | 8 | 61.5% | 57.0% | +4.5% |
| Test of Talents | Instant | 2 | 8 | 61.5% | 57.2% | +4.3% |
| Sejiri Shelter | Instant | 2 | 16 | 60.6% | 56.7% | +3.8% |
| Burning Hands | Instant | 2 | 6 | 62.5% | 58.8% | +3.7% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jeskai Oculus | 39 | 5.2% | 42.4% |
| Mono-Red Aggro | 36 | 8.3% | 41.5% |
| Izzet Prowess | 21 | 2.1% | 48.7% |
| Gruul Aggro | 5 | 0.2% | 52.2% |
| Jeskai Control | 3 | 0.9% | 57.1% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.